vailposseone
Posts : 80
OFFLINE
|
Posted on Dec 14, 2005
I. I agree, we should have dropped 250,000 troops in North Africa and surrounding areas. Warlords who pillage their people should suffer at the hands of our weaponry. (Although Im sure Kootanyale and the REST of the world would have considered it a Christian Crusade since the majority of the population in that geo is muslim.).
II. WMD's wasnt the entire reason for our entrance. Even the U.N. resolution stated that and the U.N. gave us the green light to go in... That was res. 1441.
[(sec 2. “ The President is authorized to use all means that HE DETERMINES TO BE APPROPRIATE, including force, in order to enforce the United Nations Security Council Resolutions (especially U.N.R. #1441) referenced above, defend the national security interests of the United states against the threat posed by Iraq, and restore international peace and security in the region.”
The resolution didn’t require PROOF of WMD or the Bin Laden link that you have described to go to war.
III. No link?
Bin Laden and Saddam were both of Sunni fanatic clans. Bin Laden was all too happy with the massacre and suppression of the hated infidel Shiites. They were joined TOGETHER in a holy war against the United States. Why else would Bin Laden discuss this in his second fatwa against the U.S. and defend Saddam and his sovereignty “…So here they come to annihilate what is left of this people (Saddams citizens) and to humiliate their Muslim neighbors.” (Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders World Islamic Front Statement 23 Feb. 1998)
*al Qaeda/Iraq link #1. Mohammed Atta, the ringleader of the September 11 highjack, was hosted by the terrorist Abu Nidal at his house in Iraq. Headed simply “Intelligence Items”, and dated July 1, 2002, a memo to Saddam signed by Tahir jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, the former head of the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) states the Mohammed Atta came with Abu Ammer (an Arabic nom-de-guerre- his real identity is unknown) to Abu Nidal’s house: “we arranged a work program for him for three days with a team dedicated too working with him… He displayed extraordinary effort and showed a firm commitment to lead the team which will be responsible for attacking the targets that we have agreed to destroy.”
*link #2) On Feb. 19, 1998, about six months prior to the attacks in Africa, Iraqi intelligence officials set in motion a plan to bring a senior trusted Bin Laden aide to Baghdad from Khartoum. An Iraqi intelligence document shows that a recommendation was made for “…the deputy director general to bring the [Bin Laden] envoy to Iraq because we may find in this envoy a way to maintain contacts with Bin Laden.” The meetings took place March 13, 1998.
*link #3) Iraq’s former intelligence chief, Farouk Hijazi, met with Bin Laden in Sudan in 1994 and in Afghanistan in Dec. 1998. Bin Laden visited Baghdad in Jan. 1998 and met with Iraqi Deputy foreign Minister Tariq Aziz for the purpose of establishing al Qaeda training camps in Iraq.
*link #4) Mahmdouh Mahmud Salim, who was involved in the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, also served as al liaison between Saddam and Bin Laden during the 1990’s.
*link #5) After the Cole attack, two al Qaeda terrorists went to Iraq for training in WMD (mostly bio) and to bring back info. on poisonous gas.
*link #6) According to Israeli intelligence sources quoted by Jane’s Foreign Report on Sept. 19, 2001, during the prior two years Iraqi Intelligence officers were “shuttling between Baghdad and Afghanistan, meeting with Ayman Al Zawahiri.” (The known terrorist who has been responsible for the multiple beheadings of INNOCENTS in Iraq). According to said sources, one of the Iraqi intelligence officers was captured by the Pakistanis near the border with Afghanistan.
All of these can be viewed in the 9/11 Commission Report… the nonpartisan overview of the 9/11 attacks and leading up to the war in Iraq.
Bush, Kerry, Clinton, the FBI, CIA, UN and foreign intelligence agencies ALL believed and agreed that Saddam had WMD. This ‘might have been’ flawed intelligence. Convoy trucks were seen via satellite images to be traveling to Iran, Syria, and Jordan days prior to our strikes. Could they have been carrying said weapons…we may or may not ever know.
On Oct. 2002, CIA issued a report labeling Saddam as “intent on acquiring nuclear weapons, and projecting that the country will probably have nuclear weapons during this decade, unless preventative actions are taken”.
Even in the absence of actual WMD, it is important to know and understand that those coming through the remains of Saddams regime in Iraq have already turned up incontrovertible evidence of INTENT.
Bill Clinton made the same case in 1998 as Bush made in 2002 and 2003. Clinton said in his address to the nation, “I will attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons program and it’s military capacity to threaten its neighbors.” As Clinton pointed out, Iraq wasn’t the only country to have developed WMD, but “with Saddam there’s one big difference. He has used them, not once but repeatedly, unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-log war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians. Firing scud rockets at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran, not only against a foreign enemy but against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq. The International community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today that, LEFT UNCHECKED, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again.”
Faced with the threat from Iraq, Clinton acknowledged the importance of PREEMPTION. He stated, “Heavy as they are, the cost of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people. AND MARK MY WORDS, HE WILL DEVELOP WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRUCTION. HE WILL DEPLOY THEM AND WLL USE THEM.” Sounds exactly like what Bush said before the war and is saying now. Your thoughts?
Bush has stated that there were MULTIPLE reasons for the war…most importantly to take Saddam out because he refused to abide to the United Nations rules set for him. Let inspectors in, quit screwing with their searches, disclose weapons, quit shooting at our planes patrolling the no-fly-zone, and quit supporting terrorist. (i.e. sending $30 –50K checks to families of Hamas suicide bombers). He sat on a gold mine of oil that could have been sold for said weapons and terrorist functions. Only now do we realize that the ‘oil for food program’ net him as much as $20 billion in cash…(where is it…could it be funding current attacks against our troops in Iraq?) that was to be used for food and humanitarian issues, not palaces, weapons and terrorism. As Bush put it, “Having to accept the word of a madman or the intelligence agencies of our country, I’ll take the word of our security agencies and protect our country EVERY time.”
Were not putting our country above all others, we bend over backwards for the world community BECAUSE WE ARE the the most powerful country in the world... Thats why we use the U.N. even when it hurts our own security.
A little quote in closing...
“Facts are stubborn things and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidences.” John Adams
|